Jenny Ifft

President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping have agreed to a tariff truce — but what does it actually mean for U.S. agriculture?

Why do rural communities sometimes push back on new development? Whether it’s wind and solar, data centers, power plants or something else, these projects can become highly contentious. Questions about land, local control, who benefits and the future of the community can all shape how people respond. In this episode of Smoke & Mirrors, Jennifer Ifft is joined by Rich Stedman from Cornell University to talk about when and why rural communities resist new development, and why that resistance often goes well beyond the project itself. They discuss the long history of rural communities feeling left out of decision-making, the lasting effects of the "shale gas hangover" and how past experiences can shape reactions to new energy projects. The conversation also looks at the economic side of development, including research on how farmers view solar leases and how those agreements can fit alongside their existing farming operations. Rich also explains why involving communities earlier can make a difference and how public involvement can fall short when it becomes more of a box-checking exercise than a genuine conversation.

This calculator will show SCO and ECO payments based on final county yields and harvest price for a farmer's underlying crop insurance contract.

What does it actually mean when policymakers say a proposal will affect "farmers"? The answer depends in part on which farms are being counted. In this episode of Clearing the Air on Agricultural Policy, Bart Fischer, co-director of the Agricultural and Food Policy Center (AFPC) at Texas A&M University, explains how farm-level analysis helps Congress and USDA understand the financial conditions facing working farms and the potential consequences of policy decisions.