Search
Displaying 211 - 220 of 247
Supply, LLC, 132 S. Ct. 1836 (2012) vacated.
The Supreme … A226
KEY COLLECTION POLICY CLARIFICATIONS
Page A227
K … S
Page A227
KEY EXAMINATION POLICY CLARIFICATIONS
ITIN CERTIFICATION PROCESS
• …
October 1, 2023
2023 Crop Insurance Workshop Presentations
from farming both vary by commodity.
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY … Miller 2007, Keller et al., 2012).
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY … https://ersrs.hrsa.gov/ReportServer?/HGDW_Reports/BCD_HPSA/BCD_HPSA_SCR50_Qtr_Smry_HTML&rc:Toolbar=false• Herbert, J. (2012). Cortisol and depression …
October 1, 2025
2025 Kansas Crop Insurance Presentations
from farming both vary by commodity.
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY … Miller 2007, Keller et al., 2012).
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY … https://ersrs.hrsa.gov/ReportServer?/HGDW_Reports/BCD_HPSA/BCD_HPSA_SCR50_Qtr_Smry_HTML&rc:Toolbar=false• Herbert, J. (2012). Cortisol and depression …
Modeling Impacts of Location- and Product-Targeted Demand Enhancement on Pork Producer Profitability
May 1, 2024
Meat Demand Research Studies
is useful when analyzing policies or supply shocks, for examples … where one region enacts a policy governing pork
that differs … 2004), Okrent and Alston (2012), and
Wohlgenant (2011).3 …
August 15, 2025
Crop Insurance Papers
apply to your crop or known policy information.
(1) Farm Location … Insurance Revenue Protection Policy (HPO) Information The values … details of your crop insurance policy using the pull down menus
ARC …
Breakout Sessions
market risk,
government commodity programs, crop insurance … crop insurance and public policy. Art was 1 of 30 people … measuring basis risk for commodity grains, understanding the …
September 22, 2011
1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012
Percent
I-N-07
09/13/11Livestock … of 800 lb steer
March 1, 2012 is $137.37/cwt
• … 26,154 -0.6
2012
I 7,934 -4.6 …
April 28, 2025
Recent Videos
the “leader,” but each commodity, especially soybeans will … 7.13 $0.20 ($0.20) ($0.40)2012 $6.36 $6.35 $6.47 ($0.01 … alternatives offer.• Each involve commodity options, allowing you to …
June 24, 2025
Recent Videos, Risk and Profit Online Mini-Conference Presentations
11,647
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 … 2.81
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 … SUNFLOWER
EU SELF‐SUFFICIENCY RATES FOR SELECTED AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES (%)
Note: Self‐sufficiency rates are calculated as production/consumption. A value above 100 indicates the capacity to exportSMP ‐ …
June 28, 2018
Hedging & Options
INTRODUCTION
The CME Live Cattle Futures Contract has been an important risk management tool available to
the cattle and beef industry for more than 50 years. The magnitude of capital at risk in the
industry together with elevated market volatility present today makes having a viable live cattle
futures market of immense importance in price risk management. The viability of this market
hinges on how effectively its use mitigates fed cattle price risk for hedgers.
The performance of the live cattle futures market rests heavily on contract specifications. One
debated contract specification in live cattle futures is physical delivery as a way to settle the
obligation of a short position in the market. The delivery option is the main way cash and
futures prices for delivery settled contracts can be aligned in the delivery period near contract
expiration. Convergence of cash and futures in the current contract is conditioned on delivery
potential. However, a variety of concerns surround live cattle futures contract delivery. The
magnitude of concerns prompted industry and CME Group discussions to consider eliminating
delivery in live cattle futures and switch to a cash settled contract.2 Though certainly not new,
as switching the contract to cash settlement was considered in the mid‐1990s,3,4 the debate has
elevated again in recent years.
NCBA has an established policy position supporting physical delivery settlement of the live
cattle futures contract.5 However, concerns surrounding delivery need to be carefully assessed
and evaluated to potentially improve this component of the live cattle futures contract. This
project was designed to identify and document concerns with current delivery and to provide
practical guidance to NCBA as they consider alternative physical delivery mechanisms in the live
cattle futures market.
The range of sentiments of cattle market participants we interviewed for this study ranged
from those who thought the contract worked very well to those who see the contract and
physical delivery as outdated and inconsistent with the modern live cattle industry.
…