Search

Displaying 1161 - 1170 of 5051
February 22, 2012
products, can an industry gain market share from the policy being … developing new animal and crop production methods to increase …
September 25, 2023 Ag Law Issues
basis at death equal to fair market value (except for items categorized … Base acres are a farm’s crop specific acreage of wheat … grains, rice, oilseeds, pulse crops, or peanuts that are eligible …
January 1, 2019
Sustainable Ag and Alternative Crops – Representative Steven … Executive Director, Kansas Crop Improvement Association – … provisions of the Alternative Crop Research Act. – The Department …
August 1, 2022 Breakout Sessions
times  ‐36% + 21% UKRAINE AGRICULTURAL EXPORTS (2021 CALENDAR YEAR) Product Value Top Markets TOTAL $27.8 billion EU $7.7B … week. change, USD/t %The futures market Wheat  CBOT, Sept. USA … 232.0 215.0 6.0 8.5%Cash market Wheat SRW Aug USA CPT Mex …
August 1, 2022 2022 Risk and Profit Conference Recordings
times  ‐36% + 21% UKRAINE AGRICULTURAL EXPORTS (2021 CALENDAR YEAR) Product Value Top Markets TOTAL $27.8 billion EU $7.7B … week. change, USD/t %The futures market Wheat  CBOT, Sept. USA … 232.0 ‐11.0 ‐4.7%Cash market Wheat SRW Aug USA CPT Mex …
January 30, 2023 Ag Law Issues
requirements if desiring to market pork products in California … protect the national economic market from opportunistic behavior … actors compete in the same market. But, the reason that the …
April 1, 2015 Land Buying and Valuing
the average for each of the Crop Reporting Districts (CRD … land sold through typical market channels and does not include … sale from being considered a market-based transaction.    Kansas State University Department of Agricultural Economics (Publication: AM‐MRT‐2015.2)   …
April 1, 2015 Land Buying and Valuing
the average for each of the Crop Reporting Districts (CRD … land sold through typical market channels and does not include … sale from being considered a market-based transaction.    Kansas State University Department of Agricultural Economics (Publication: AM‐MRT‐2015.2)   …
June 22, 2017 Commodity Program Papers, KFMA Research
                                                                                                                                                    1  Farm Bill Program Enrollment Decisions by Kansas Farmers     Candice Wilson (clwilson@ksu.edu), Mykel Taylor (mtaylor@ksu.edu), and Glynn Tonsor (gtonsor@ksu.edu)  Kansas State University Department of Agricultural Economics ‐ June 2017      The 2014 Farm Bill required Kansas producers to make a series of enrollment decisions that  were both complicated and based on incomplete information. With this bill, producers were required  to complete a one‐time enrollment in one of three programs, Agriculture Risk Coverage‐County  Coverage (ARC‐CO), Agricultural Risk Coverage‐Individual Coverage (ARC‐IC) and Price Loss Coverage  (PLC), to serve as a safety net for poor crop prices and/or yields over the five‐year life of the legislation.  As agricultural production represents the largest sector of the Kansas economy, valued at over $64  million annually (43% of the total economy), the analysis of predicted and actual enrollment is crucial  in giving insight into producers’ decision‐making processes. The current downturn facing the  agricultural sector coupled with political pressure to reduce federal expenditures only intensifies the  need for an effective and economically sustainable safety net. Due to the nature of the one‐time  enrollment for the five‐year life of the 2014 Farm Bill, it is imperative to understand how producers  made their program selection. Considering the effects of incomplete information on producers’  decisions provides an opportunity to identify challenges associated with program selection under the  2014 Farm Bill and suggest changes for future farm support legislation.     Data used for the analysis of program enrollment were collected from a variety of sources: FSA,  NASS, and Kansas State University were all sources of information used to statistically investigate  factors affecting program enrollment by Kansas farmers. Survey data were obtained from  approximately 1,400 producers across the state of Kansas to help identify specific enrollment  considerations. The surveys were collected before and after K‐State Extension educational efforts at 15  meetings. These meetings were held across the state of Kansas between January and March of 2015  and attended by over 4,000 farmers, landowners, and others.    Highlighted Results  1 …
August 1, 2017 Breakout Sessions
third of total costs per crop acre. In this session, we … The Western part of the state experience problems first Adjusted for inflation How Has Crop Machinery Investment Changed • … 100 $ 200 $ 300 $ 400 Year Crop Machinery Investment per …