Search

Displaying 91 - 100 of 242
August 1, 2025 Breakout Sessions
tree cover vary across the study area? Survey • Survey … bathrooms, etc..• In our case, land estimates can be made … throughout the time of our study. Effect of Tree Cover • …
August 19, 2024 Beef Cattle
additive. The objective of our study is to estimate the needed … by following the ‘Full Study’ link at the end of this …
May 9, 2016 USDA METSS Project
Respondents and Districts in the Study Area … enumeration areas in the defined study areas and then selecting … representative of activities in the study area, and any representativeness …
December 1, 2015 KFMA Newsletters
             3  can’t prove it statistically, it would appear to me that the financial health of the average KFMA Association farm is  certainly in one of the strongest positions financially ‐ if not the strongest financial position ‐ in the 84 year history of the  Association program.  I might also add that during this time period we have had some favorable income tax laws, in  particular rapid depreciation methods such as Sec 179, and bonus depreciation that has encouraged reinvestment in the  farm business and the deferment of the tax liability to some future years.  As we turn our attention to the 2014 KFMA SC data on 208 farms, and compare them to prior year’s data, there are  certainly concerns regarding some of the numbers.  Accrual net farm income was $52,996, which is the lowest figure  since 2005.  Nearly the entire drop in net farm income from 2013 to 2014 was attributed to a drop in gross farm income.   Total farm expense in 2013 was $458,045 compared to $455,611 in 2014.    Debt per crop acre was $298 at the end of  2014 compared to $199 at the end of 2008.  (Bill Collins, a retired KFMA SC Economist, used to say that farms acquire  debt in good years and pay them off in bad years.  This appears to be the case once again.)  Working capital dropped  from 2013 when it was $311,546 to $237,324 in 2014.  As of this writing, the cash price for 2015 crops look something  like this: wheat $4.23, corn $3.56, beans $7.87 and milo $3.14.  By my cost estimates (including a land charge and  machinery depreciation), and using average yields, all of these prices are below the cost of production.  I recognize that  cattle prices remain high. However, the cattle influence on the average KFMA SC farm is minimal compared to grain  farming.  Given the context of this price environment these 2014 numbers are of concern.   This brings me to a topic that is not focused on enough, but one I want you to become more familiar with. The term is  capital debt repayment capacity, or to use the term I have used for many years simply, debt servicing ability.  How much  capacity does your farm have to service debt?   Every business has a limit on how much debt can be serviced without  impairing the production efficiency of the business, or worse the financial capability of sustaining itself long term.  This  repayment capacity might be defined as:   =Net Farm Income + Depreciation + Non‐Farm Income – Family Living Expense + Interest on Term Debt   You can easily calculate this for any year by looking back at past years income tax returns by specifically looking at  Schedule F.  (I realize that your tax return is not accrual adjusted so looking at your profit link analysis would be a better  source.)  Supplement that with Non Schedule F income, and your family living expense, and you basically have identified  the repayment capacity of your farm as it was during those past years.  Looking ahead will require some adjustments;  however, as profitability going forward will not be as strong as prior years as we have already outlined.  Preparing a cash  flow for the coming year will give you a better idea as to the current repayment capacity of the farm.  In regards to a  family living expense number, of the 64 southcentral Kansas families that provided family living records in 2014 their  average family living expense was $71,380, before income tax.   Once you have identified your repayment capacity, make a schedule of all your principal and interest payments due in  2015.  Better yet, make a schedule of your principal and interest payments for the next five years given your total  liabilities.  Does your farm have enough repayment capacity to make those payments in the years ahead?  Is there any  margin left to acquire new debt and add to the debt service you already have?  In my opinion you need to know these  answers before you should even begin to shop for additional machinery.  If you are already upside down in regards to  your debt service payments relative to your repayment capacity you need to first identify how many years this problem  persists.  As an example, if your debt payments go down significantly in 2017 and come in line with capacity, how do you  survive 2015 and 2016?  Do you have enough working capital to make up the difference?  If not you may need to  restructure debt using land collateral to stretch out payments over 15 years instead of the 5 years the equipment  company or bank has given you.    An example of this would be a $500,000 machinery note amortized over 5 years at 3% has an annual payment of  $109,177. Compare this to a $500,000 land note with an interest rate of 5% over 15 years with an annual payment of      http://www.agmanager.info/kfma/                                      November 2015 E‐newsletter                                                   …
July 1, 2019 KFMA Newsletters
NFI, but this was not the case as the larger farms had … ground. This would also be the case across Kansas or other parts … high school there, Travis studied at Cloud County Community …
October 6, 2025 Ag Law Issues
provide a cost-segregation study to provide that allocation … Unused Exemption – Recent Case The Tax Court, in Estate … owed. The facts of the case are that Fay died in 2016 …
February 1, 2012 Risk Management Strategies
farm level yields, in most cases. 2. The lower the yield … workshop that uses a 2 crop casestudy and covers insurance and … Rights Reserved1/30/2012 case
July 1, 2010 Animal ID & Traceability
summarizes the results of this study. More details or published … research papers from this study are available from www.agmanager.info. Methods Because … Interested readers are encouraged to view the benefit/cost study conducted on the NAIS program at http://www. agmanager.info/livestock/marketing/AnimalID/default. asp as well as to review the history of USDA’s NAIS program at http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/ animal_diseases/animal_id/. 2 …
August 1, 2012 Certification of Meat Attributes
Literature Overview Several studies have conducted experiments … 2010). One often cited study is Lusk et al. (2001) who … ribeye steaks following study participants completing a …
March 1, 2012 Basis
delivery location. Several studies have shown that it is difficult … Price. (2) In such cases these parties are using the … forward contract. In the case of a short hedge the producer …