Search
Displaying 701 - 710 of 3933
August 9, 2012
drought has magnified cattle market impact
compared to 2011 … Cow
C-P-66
08/02/12
Livestock Marketing Information Center
Data … Cow
C-P-66
03/21/12Livestock Marketing Information Center Data Source …
August 20, 2012
drought magnified cattle market impact
compared to 2011 … Cow
C-P-66
08/09/12Livestock Marketing Information Center
Data … Cow
C-P-66
03/21/12Livestock Marketing Information Center Data Source …
June 21, 2022
5/27/22)
Data Source: Livestock Marketing Information Center
% Chg … 5/27/22)
Data Source: Livestock Marketing Information Center
Live … Source: USDA-NASS
Livestock Marketing Information Center
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
0 …
January 11, 2021
Feeder Cattle Pricing
Agricultural Economics Extension Publication 01/10/2021 … a position in the futures market, selling (buying) the CME … to sell (buy) in the cash market at a later date. In doing …
November 1, 2012
Animal Well-Being
Beef Cattle Institute (Publication: November 2012) Page 2 … Beef Cattle Institute (Publication: November 2012) Page 3 … from the USDA Federal- State Marketing Improvement Program …
August 28, 2015
Financial Management
ersity Department Of Agricultural Economics Extension Publication 08/28/2015
WRITTEN BY: NICOLAS E. QUINTANA‐ASHWELL …
1 Highlights prepared from research paper: Quintana‐Ashwell, Nicolas E., and Allen M. Featherstone. "Beyond benchmarks:
DEA study of Kansas Farm Productivity." 2015 Annual Meeting, January 31‐February 3, 2015, Atlanta, Georgia. No. 196857.
Southern Agricultural Economics Association, 2014.
Kansas State University Department Of Agricultural Economics Extension Publication 08/28/2015
WRITTEN BY: NICOLAS E. QUINTANA‐ASHWELL …
August 28, 2015
KFMA Research
ersity Department Of Agricultural Economics Extension Publication 08/28/2015
WRITTEN BY: NICOLAS E. QUINTANA‐ASHWELL …
1 Highlights prepared from research paper: Quintana‐Ashwell, Nicolas E., and Allen M. Featherstone. "Beyond benchmarks:
DEA study of Kansas Farm Productivity." 2015 Annual Meeting, January 31‐February 3, 2015, Atlanta, Georgia. No. 196857.
Southern Agricultural Economics Association, 2014.
Kansas State University Department Of Agricultural Economics Extension Publication 08/28/2015
WRITTEN BY: NICOLAS E. QUINTANA‐ASHWELL …
December 1, 2016
KFMA Research
Agricultural Economics Extension Publication 12/01/2016 … Agricultural Economics Extension Publication 12/01/2016 … Agricultural Economics Extension Publication 12/01/2016 …
September 26, 2017
Precision Ag and Technology Articles
ersity Department Of Agricultural Economics Extension Publication 09/26/2017
… 1
Who Can Own Farm Data?
Terry Griffin (twgriffin@ksu.edu)
Kansas State University Department of Agricultural Economics ‐ September 2017
In the previous article, the notion that farm data aggregated into a community truly fit the concept of
‘big data’ was demonstrated. For many agriculturists, the more important issue is data ownership. The
question of who owns farm data goes back at least to the advent of precision agriculture in the 1990s.
Data ownership, privacy, and security have cyclically been hot topics since then but have recently
peaked with ‘big data’. When discussing ownership of physical goods such as commodities, machinery,
and farmland, it is intuitive what ‘ownership’ means. Farm data does not fit many preconceived
notions of ‘ownership’ like these physical examples.
The legal perspective of farm data ownership has been addressed individually by Extension agricultural
attorneys including Tiffany Dowell and Shannon Ferrell and at least one attorney in private practice, Todd
Janzen. Complementing their work, I describe how economic principles apply to farm data that are
digital and have very different characteristics than physical goods. Copies of digital data can be made
at relatively zero cost and are indistinguishable from the original. Given that copies are identical to
each other and the original, very minimal control exists over what happens to that data once copies
have been made available to another party. Multiple entities (e.g. farmers, landowners, input
suppliers, soil sampling services, aggregators, lenders, etc.) may have partial access to viable copies of
the same farm data.
Applying the economic principles of public goods versus private good …
August 1, 2009
KFMA Newsletters
through probate is a matter of
public record.
Also in this … rally in the
feeder cattle market through sometime between … Operator Labor and 3% Shrink
Market animal (Includes 3% Shrink …