Search
Displaying 531 - 540 of 682
December 23, 2015
Grain Market Outlook
oduct supply‐demand and price projections for the 2013/14, “old crop” 2014/15, as well as the “new crop”
2015/16 marketing years. The “new crop” 2015/16 marketing year for U.S. soybeans began on September 1,
2015 and will last through August 31, 2016. For soybean meal and soybean oil, the “new crop” 2015/16
marketing year began on October 1, 2015 and will last through September 30, 2016.
I‐B. Commentary on World Soybean Market Trends
The activities of the World soybean market over the last 3 to 5 years can be better understood by
recognizing several “predominant trends” that have been occurring in production and export/import trade
among major countries and regions of the World involved in soybean trade. The primary countries involved in
or “driving” these predominant trends have been China in terms of demand factors, and South American
countries (Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, and others) and the United States i …
February 17, 2014
Grain Market Outlook
March 2014
CBOT eKC‐Wheat
Close = $6.74 ½
on Friday, Feb. 14
July 2014
CBOT eKC‐Wheat
Close = $6.57
on Friday, Feb. 14
Page | 3
I‐D. U.S. Wheat Production
Total U.S. Wheat Acreage, Yield & Production in “Current” MY 2013/14
The USDA left unchanged its projection of U.S. 2013 planted acreage of 56.156 million acres (ma) – up
from both 55.666 ma in 2012, and 54.409 ma in 2011 (Table 1 and Figures 1‐2). Projected 2013 harvested
acreage was also unchanged at 45.157 ma – down from both 48.921 ma in 2012 and 45.705 ma in 2011. The
2013 proportion of harvested‐to‐planted acreage for all U.S. wheat is projected to be 80.4%, down from 87.9%
in 2012, 84.0% in 2011 – falling to the lowest level since 76.0% in 2002.
Projected 2013 U.S. average wheat yield of 47.2 bushels per acre (bu/ac) is a record high (Table 1 and
Figure 3), being above to the previous records of 46.3 bu/ac in 2012 and 2010, and above 43.7 bu/ac in 2011.
The USDA left unchanged its projection of 2013 U.S. wheat production to be 2.130 billion bushels (bb) –down
from a 2.266 bb in 2012, while being up from 1.999 bb in 2011 (Table 1).
U.S. Winter Wheat Production in 2013 & Planted Acreage for the 2014 Crop
In its January 10th Winter Wheat Seedings report the USDA projected U.S. winter wheat planted acreage
seeded in the fall of 2013 for harvest in 2014 to be 41.892 million acres (ma) – down from 43.090 ma in 2013,
but greater than 41.224 ma in 2012, and 40.646 ma in 2011 (Figure 1). No projections of 2014 winter wheat
harvested acreage, yields or production have yet been made by the USDA.
The USDA left unchanged its projection of 2013 U.S. winter wheat planted acreage at 43.090 million acres
(ma), with projected 2013 winter wheat harvested acreage was also unchanged at 32.402 ma – down from
34.734 ma in 2012, but greater than 32.314 ma in 2011. The 2013 proportion of harvested‐to‐planted acreage
for all U.S. winter wheat is projected to be 79.5% (just below the recent average), down from 84.3% in 2012,
but up from 75.2% in 2011. During the 2000‐2013 time period, U.S. winter wheat percent harvested‐to‐
planted acreage averaged 79.8%, with a median (i.e., 50th percentile) of 79.7%, and a a low‐high range of
71.2%‐85.5%.
Projected 2013 U.S. average winter wheat yields of 47.4 bushels per acre (bu/ac) are marginally above 47.3
bu/ac in 2012, and above 46.2 bu/ac in 2011. The USDA projected 2013 U.S. winter wheat production to be
1.534 bb – down from a 1.641 bb in 2012, but up from 1.494 bb in 2011.
U.S. Other Spring Wheat
The USDA …
December 28, 2017
Grain Market Outlook
…
Page | 4
I. U.S. Grain Sorghum Market Situation and Outlook
I‐a. December 12th USDA Crop Production & WASDE Reports
On December 12th the USDA World Agricultural Outlook Board (WAOB) released its December 2017
World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE) report – containing U.S. and World grain sorghum
supply‐demand and price projections for the 2015/16, “old crop” 2016/17, and “new crop” 2017/18 marketing
years (MY). The “new crop” MY 2017/18 for U.S. corn began on September 1, 2017 and will last through
August 31, 2018. Monthly USDA WASDE estimates of U.S. crop and livestock supply‐demand and prices can
be found at the following web address: https://www.usda.gov/oce/commodity/wasde/
On the same day the USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) released its December 2017
Crop Production report. This report can be found at the following web address:
http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/CropProd/CropProd‐12‐12‐2017.pdf
The next survey‐based report of U.S. corn production results for 2017 will be released in the USDA Annual
Crop Production Summary and Crop Production reports on January 12, 2018. The same U.S. on‐farm grain
sorghum plots which were sampled for the August, September, October, and November USDA NASS Crop
Production reports will revisited for the January 2018 report – with final 2017 post‐harvest production results
reported.
On November 28, 2017 the USDA released its Long Term Agricultural Projections through year 2027.
United States’ grain sorghum supply‐demand and price projections were included, along with corn, wheat,
soybeans, cotton and other major crops. These Long Term Agricultural Projections can be found at the
following website: https://www.usda.gov/oce/commodity/projections/
I‐b. Kansas Grain Sorghum Seasonal Average Price Trends
During the eighteen (18) year period from the 1999/2000 through 2016/17 marketing years the typical
season price pattern for grain sorghum in Kansas exhibited pronounced pre‐harvest through harvest lows
during September‐October (Figure 2). Then prices have trended higher from November through April,
becoming level at seasonal highs during the April through June period. Kansas grain sorghum prices then
tended to decline from June into July, and then to decline further into August. The widest variability around
these average seasonal price trends occurred during the June through September period.
So far during the “new crop” 2017/18 marketing year which began on September 1, 2017, U.S. grain
sorghum prices declined from September‐October into November, but have recovered from November lows
into December 2017 in a stronger manner than normal (Figure 2). Contra‐seasonal strength in U.S. grain
sorghum prices in December 2017 is attributed to strong demand for U.S. grain sorghum exports – primary
from China and Japan.
These long‐term average price trends for Kansas are compared to projections of “new crop” MY 2017/18
U.S. grain sorghum average prices. These projections are based on U.S. cash grain sorghum and corn prices for
Page | 5
September and October 2017 from USDA NASS, CME corn futures prices on December 26, 2017, and 2016/17
marketing years monthly average U.S. corn basis levels.
This updated version of Kansas State University projections for the complete “new crop” MY 2017/18
projects U.S. grain sorghum season average prices to average $3.25 per bushel. This is up $0.15 per bushel
from the December 12th USDA WASDE midpoint projection of $3.10, but within the upper end of the USDA
forecast range of $2.75‐$3.45 per bushel (Figure 2). These findings indicated that it is likely SEPT 2018 and DEC
2018 CME corn futures prices are higher than they would be if grain markets were more confident at this time
of “average‐to‐large” 2018 U.S. corn and grain sorghum crops. These corn futures contract prices are likely to
decline in Spring‐early Summer 2018 IF significant combined U.S. corn and grain sorghum production problems
ultimately do NOT emerge in the growing season next year.
Figure 2. Kansas Grain Sorghum Seasonal Price Index (MY 1999/00 – MY 2016/17) plus “New Crop”
MY 2017/18 Estimates as of December 26, 2017 (Sources: KSU www.AgManager.info & USDA ERS http://www.ers.usda.gov/data‐
products/season‐average‐price‐forecasts.aspx)
II. U.S. Grain Sorghum Acreage, Yield, Production & Total Supplies
Table 1 shows the USDA U.S. grain sorghum supply‐demand balance sheet for the MY 2008/09 through
“new crop” MY 2017/18 period. Table 1a focuses on “new crop” MY 2017/18 with the December 12th USDA
projection plus alternative possible market scenarios from Kansas State University. An adjusted version of the
USDA’s Long Term Agricultural Projection for U.S. grain sorghum supply‐demand and prices with forecasts for
“next crop” MY 2018/19 is also included in Table 1a. Grain sorghum planted and harvested planted acreage in
the U.S. for the 2006 – projected 2018 period are shown in Figure 2, with U.S. grain sorghum yields for 2006
through projected 2018 shown in Figure 3. United States’ grain sorghum production and total supplies for the
2005/06 through projected “next crop” 2018/19 marketing years are shown in Figure 4.
95 …
March 30, 2018
Grain Market Outlook
gularly occurring in South America and the United States. Strong demand for
soybean imports from China, Japan, and other Asian countries have supported World soybean prices.
Longer term, from MY 2007/08 to “old crop” MY 2017/18, this strong upward trend in World soybean
production (up 5.6% annually) has “out‐paced” increases in World soybean use (up 5.0% per year). As long as
growth in World soybean production continues to outpace World soybean usage, then World soybean stocks
will remain at high levels with prices continuing at their current “moderate” levels – being affected positively
be ongoing strength in demand, but held “in check” by more than adequate world supplies.
The potential for soybean market disruptions from trade policy‐related confrontations between the U.S. and
China has emerged as an issue in early 2018. These economic – geopolitical tensions so far have not resulted
in official direct tariffs or import limitations by China on U.S. soybeans. However, it is reported that Chinese
buyers of soybeans have responded by aggressively pursuing Brazilian soybean imports, and to a degree have
at least moderated their purchases of U.S. soybeans in recent months. So, although no official action has been
taken by China against U.S. soybean imports, such tensions have to a degree already affected U.S. soybean
trade by “pressuring” Chinese buyers to redirect their buying focus toward Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, and
wherever else globally they can secure soybean and oilseed products.
B. Soybean Market Response to the March 8th & 29th USDA Reports
Since the USDA released its World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE) report on March 8th
soybean futures prices had moved primarily lower. From the March 8th close of $10.64, CME MAY 2018
Soybean futures prices have traded from a high of $10.63 on 3/9/2018 down to a low of $10.09 ¼ on March
23rd, before closing at $10.18 on Wednesday, March 28th – the day prior to the USDA Quarterly Stocks &
Prospective Plantings reports on March 29th. Then on the day of the March 29th USDA reports, CME MAY
2018 Soybean futures responded positively, trading from a low of $10.12 ½ to a high of $10.50 ¾ before
closing at $10.44 ¾ – up $0.26 ¾ per bushel for the day.
Kansas cash soybean prices at terminals in central and eastern Kansas ranged from $9.42 ¾ to $9.89 ¾ /bu on
March 29th – with basis ranging from $1.02 under to $0.60 under MAY 2018 Soybean futures. That same day
in western Kansas, major grain elevator bids ranged from $9.10 to $9.45 per bushel – with basis ranging from
$1.35 under to $1.00 under.
C. World Soybean Supply‐Demand Findings in the March 8th WASDE USDA Report
On March 8th for the “old crop” 2017/18 marketing year (MY) to end on August 31, 2018, the USDA projected
the following.
Page | 2
First, that World soybean total supplies would be 437.5 million metric tons (mmt) (down 3.0%) with total use
of 34.8 mmt (up 4.2%) for “old crop” MY 2017/18. With supplies moving lower and demand increasing, there
has been a moderate “tightening” of projected World ending stocks of soybeans.
Second, that World soybean exports will continue trending higher – up to a record high to 150.6 mmt in the
“old crop” 2017/18 marketing year. This amount of World soybean exports of 150.6 mmt in “old crop” MY
2017/18 would be up from previous records of 147.5 mmt last year, and 132.6 mmt two years ago. World
soybean exports have been growing annually at a 9.1% rate since the 2007/08 marketing year.
Third, that World soybean ending stocks would be a 94.4 mmt in “old crop” MY 2017/18 ‐ down from the
record high of 96.65 mmt in MY 2016/17, but still up from 78.3 mmt in MY 2015/16. Overall, World soybean
ending stocks have grown at an 8.0% rate annually since the 2007/08 marketing year.
Fourth, that World soybean percent ending stocks‐to‐use (% S/U) would be 27.5% ‐ the 2nd highest on record
but down from the record high of 29.3% last year, while being up from 24.9% and 25.7% the two years prior.
D. USDA U.S. Soybean Supply/Demand for “Old Crop” MY 2017/18 & “New Crop” MY 2018/19
The USDA released their soybean production, supply‐demand and price projections for the U.S. for “old crop”
MY 2017/18 in the March 8th WASDE report, for “new crop” MY 2018/19 in its February 23rd USDA Ag Outlook
Forum projections, for 2018 planted acres in the March 29th Prospective Plantings report, and for November‐
February 2018 usage of U.S. soybeans and March 29th Grain Stocks report.
U.S. soybean plantings are forecast to be 88.982 million acres (ma) in 2018, down from 90.142 ma in 2017, and
83.433 ma in 2016. Harvested acres are forecast by Kansas State University to be 88.222 ma in 2018 (99.15%
harvested‐to‐planted – latest 5 year average), down 1.45% from 89.522 ma in year 2017, but up 6.7% from
82.696 ma in 2016.
The 2018 U.S. average soybean yield is forecast at 48.5 bu/ac, down from a KSU‐adjusted estimate of 49.79
bu/ac in 2017, and from the 2016 record of 52.0 bu/acre. This KSU adjustment to the most recent official
USDA estimate on March 8th was made following the March 29th grain stocks report. The USDA estimate of
March 1, 2018 U.S. soybean stocks came in approximately 65 mb larger than trade estimates. Given that
estimates of U.S. soybean domestic crush, exports, and seed use for the November‐February 2018 quarter are
known with some accuracy, it seems that the unexplained increase in U.S. soybean stocks on March 1st may be
due to the USDA underestimating the size of the 2017 U.S. soybean crop. As a result, if 2017 soybean planted
and harvested acreage are left unchanged, and 65 mb is added to the size of the 2017 U.S. soybean crop, then
this KSU‐adjusted estimate of 2017 U.S. soybean yields is raised to 49.79 bu/ac – up from the latest USDA’s
official 2017 U.S. soybean yield estimate of 49.1 bu/ac.
Soybean production in the U.S. in 2018 is forecast to be 4.279 billion bushels (bb), down from the KSU‐
adjusted record high of 4.457 bb in 2017 (vs the latest USDA estimate of 4.392 bb – see discussion above), but
up from 4.296 bb in 2016. After these adjustments, projected “new crop” MY 2018/19 U.S. soybean total
supplies are forecast at 4.924 bb, up from a KSU‐adjusted 4.783 bb in “old crop” MY 2017/18, and from 4.515
bb in MY 2016/17. Record high U.S. soybean total use of 4.415 bb is forecast for “new crop” MY 2018/19, up
from 4.163 bb in “old crop” MY 2017/18, and from 4.213 bb in MY 2016/17.
With previously mentioned changes in 2017 U.S. soybean production resulting from the outcome of the March
29th Grain Stocks report, the KSU‐adjusted USDA projection for “new crop” MY 2018/19 U.S. soybean ending
Page | 3
stocks equals 509 million bushels (mb) (11.52% stocks/use), down from a KSU‐adjusted estimate of 620 mb in
“new crop” MY 2017/18 (14.89% stocks/use), but up from 302 mb in MY 2016/17 (7.17% stocks/use).
United States’ soybean prices are projected to average $9.40 /bu in “new crop” MY 2018/19, up from $9.30
/bu in “old crop” MY 2017/18, but down from $9.47 in MY 2016/17, and comparable to $8.95 /bu in MY
2015/16, and $10.10 /bu in MY 2014/15. It is estimated by Kansas State University that these KSU‐adjusted
USDA projections for “new crop” MY 2018/19 have a 55% probability of occurring.
D. Two Alternative KSU U.S. Soybean S/D Forecasts for “New Crop” MY 2018/19
To represent possible alternative outcomes from the KSU‐adjusted USDA February 23rd projection for “new
crop” MY 2018/19, two potential KSU‐Scenarios for U.S. soybean supply‐demand and prices are presented.
KSU Scenario 1) “HIGHER 2018 U.S. Soybean Production” Scenario for “new crop” MY 2018/19 (25%
probability): 88.982 ma planted, 99.15% harvested‐to‐planted, 88.222 ma harvested, 52.0 bu/ac average
yield, 4.588 bb production, 5.233 bb total supplies, 2.350 bb exports, 2.000 bb domestic crush, 135 mb seed &
residual use, 4.485 bb total use, 748 mb ending stocks, 16.68% Stocks/Use, & $8.50 /bu U.S. soybean average
price.
KSU Scenario 1) “LOWER 2018 U.S. Soybean Production” Scenario for “new crop” MY 2018/19 (20%
probability): 88.982 ma planted, 99.15% harvested‐to‐planted, 88.222 ma harvested, 42.0 bu/ac average
yield, 3.705 bb production, 4.350 bb total supplies, 2.000 bb exports, 1.960 bb domestic crush, 135 mb seed &
residual use, 4.095 bb total use, 255 mb ending stocks, 6.23% Stocks/Use, & $11.00 /bu U.S. soybean average
price.
…
October 4, 2024
Methods and Supporting Information
roast, beef
sandwiches and other beef-based meals.
“Pork” … roast,
ground pork, and other pork-based meals.
“Chicken” … chicken, chicken sandwiches and other chicken-based meals.
“Fish/Seafood” …
March 7, 2025
Methods and Supporting Information
roast, beef
sandwiches and other beef-based meals. “Pork” … pork roast, ground pork, and other pork-based meals.
“Chicken” … chicken, chicken sandwiches and other chicken-based meals.
“Fish/Seafood” …
October 4, 2024
Methods and Supporting Information (Prior Years)
roast, beef
sandwiches and other beef-based meals.
“Pork” … roast,
ground pork, and other pork-based meals.
“Chicken” … chicken, chicken sandwiches and other chicken-based meals.
“Fish/Seafood” …
February 20, 2013
Risk Management Strategies
with interim financing to meet cash flow
needs without … plus accrued interest and other charges p p p g
Alternative …
Price Risk Publications
set up a margin account and meet margin
calls if the market … associated futures contract. In other
words, a March corn option … is not as important as
the other factors, interest rates would …
December 1, 2016
KFMA Research
3
cropping mixture, fertility program, farming practices, and operation structure), rather than luck, are leading to the
difference between the financial states.
Data and Methods
Persistence was tested on nearly 1,300 KFMA farmer‐members using panel data from 1993 through 2014.
Five different categories were created to categorize farms into different levels of financial stability. Farms were then
categorized by different threshold values for the variables: Debt to Asset (D/A) ratio and Net Farm Income by Acre.
Debt to asset ratios have often been used when determining the viability of a loan applicant, therefore, it became one
of the key determining factors used to categorize farms into different financial categories. A D/A of 0.4 or lower was
deemed to be a necessary level where a farm was financially favorable. The second break point was if the farm had a
positive net farm income per acre (NFI/AC) or a negative NFI/AC. Due to the nature of farming a positive income is not
always possible, but a farm that is able to maintain breakeven production costs shows management skills and an
ability to properly control for price risk.
Break points, loosely based upon the USDA Economic Research Service financial vulnerability definition, were
used and each farm was assigned to a category for each year that their data were available in the KFMA data set.
Once farm observations not meeting the inclusion criteria were omitted, 28,294 observations remained for further
analysis. Outliers were farms that had D/A above 1 or were negative, an impossible scenario that may indicate a
corrupt entry. Category 1 farms were farms considered to be financially favorable with a positive NFI/AC and a D/A
ratio greater than the lending industry standard of 0.4. These farms were designated as favorable because of their
profitability and their solvent nature. Category 2 farms were farms with a negative NFI/AC, but were not highly
leveraged with a D/A below 0.4 and were called Marginal Income. Category 3 was similar to Category 1 except these
farms had a positive NFI/AC and were considered highly leveraged and lacking the preferred solvency, hence the term
Marginal Solvency. It should be noted that Category 3 and Category 4 were not ordinal but could be considered
equivalent when attempting to rank across categories. However, Category 4 was the poorest rating, including farms
that were highly leveraged with a D/A above 0.4 and negative NFI/AC giving them the designation of Vulnerable. The
Kansas State University Department Of Agricultural Economics Extension Publication …