Search
Displaying 1101 - 1110 of 8833
August 29, 2017
Agribusiness Papers
accurately assess
investment and management decisions of shuttle-loading … findings can be used to assess management
decisions is an improved …
January 10, 2018
Agribusiness Papers
cooperative directors and
managers should consider their own …
The Tax Reform and Jobs Act of 2017 could have significant implications for how agricultural cooperatives distribute
patronage back to their members. Under the tax reform plan, there are four key changes for cooperatives – (1)
elimination of the domestic production activities deduction or Section 199; (2) lower corporate tax rates; (3) lower
member taxes on qualified patronage distributions; and (4) a new tax deduction tentatively labeled Section 199A which
provides a deduction at the cooperative level as well as a deduction at the member level. Many cooperative directors,
managers, farmer‐owners, and poli …
April 6, 2016
Land Buying and Valuing
Co.
NET FARM INCOME
Returns to Farming
Source: KS Farm Management Association
Updated: Return … Returns to Farming
Source: KS Farm Management Association
KANSAS AG LAND VALUES
2015 Cropland Values
2015 Pasture Values …
2018 Extension Outlook Conference
agricultural and natural resource managers;
2. enable climate-smart … decision-making; and
3. direct land managers to USDA agency programs and …
October 10, 2018
Grain Marketing Presentations
of Traders to 10/2/2018
Managed Money (Spec) Positions in … of Traders to 10/2/2018
Managed Money (Spec) Positions in …
October 15, 2018
2018 Crop Insurance Workshop Presentations
Trends in Kansas
Kansas Farm Management Association (KFMA) Info
Financial … Trends in KansasKansas Farm Management Association (KFMA) Info
KFMA Association Membership Map & Office Locations
$94,071
$144,576 … Averages for Kansas Farm Management Association Farms
$294 …
February 8, 2019
tock Reports: What, When, Where?Women Managing the Farm ConferenceFebruary 8, 2019/Manhattan, KansasRich LlewelynEmail: rvl@ksu.edu/Phone: 785.532.1504
K‐State Dept. of Agricultural Economics
• … Oakland A’s general manager
• Determined “prices” for things not generally considered “priceable”
– …
March 22, 2019
Research Papers and Presentations
counter-balanced by the
management required to coordinate a … data from the Kansas Farm Management Association
(KFMA). The …
September 26, 2017
Precision Ag and Technology Articles
2
Since farm data are non‐rival and digital (i.e. copies can be made at near‐zero cost), we must accept
that farm data are “non‐excludable” once other users have access. Given that copies of data are
considered identical to the original, the ability to exclude others from accessing data no longer exists
once another entity has a copy (i.e. access). Most privately held goods typically are excludable;
however the lack of excludability does not necessarily mean that farm data are a public good.
Rather than consider data ownership, a better question regarding farm data may be ‘can I keep others
from accessing data that only I control?’. The answer is ‘yes, but only until the data are shared with a
third party or aggregated into community’. Privately held farm data may be considered excludable if
and only if it is in the possession of the party that generated it (see our recent paper for discussion).
Once the farm data has been shared with another party or aggregated into a big data community,
excludability has essentially been eliminated. Therein lies the problem. To make the most use of farm
data it typically needs to be aggregated into a community for big data analysis to provide useful
insights (see forthcoming article on value of data isolated to the farm versus aggregated into
community). The notion of 1) excluding others from accessing data and 2) making the most valuable
use of data are at competing ends. I’m not going to discount the importance of excluding others from
accessing data; the individual must make a benefit‐cost analysis decision at each decision step. First, if
a landowner asks for a copy of data generated from their farmland then it is likely most farmers would
opt to maintain a positive working relationship. Second, data remaining in ‘data tombs’ or ‘data silos’
isolated to an individual farm has essentially zero value until that data are converted to information
suitable for making farm management decisions. When properly …
March 3, 2021
Managing Risk and Marketing Grain in 2021 - Presentations, Price Risk Publications
well as in how
best to manage the risk of unforeseen significant … Kansas corn marketing and risk management tools. It
addresses how … irrelevant. The USDA Risk
Management Agency (RMA) Projected Price …