Search
Displaying 101 - 110 of 117
August 15, 2016
Breakout session presentations
2016 Risk andProfit Conference
Breakout Session … Through KFMA he provides profitability analysis as well as income … “Boom” times: increased profit margins and cash flows can encourage growth of farm operation and expanded borrowing• …
September 26, 2022
Industry Economics & Trade
down from 92.7 percent the
previous five years (2011-2015 … up from 41.6 percent the previous five years (2011-2015)
(Figure …
July 18, 2012
Energy
cost variability and greater risk management challenges ...........18
Figure … characterized by natural lag between profits and changes in slaughter … required cuts in use in the event of short-crop conditions.
Livestock …
July 18, 2012
Cash Prices & Marketing Strategies
cost variability and greater risk management challenges ...........18
Figure … characterized by natural lag between profits and changes in slaughter … required cuts in use in the event of short-crop conditions.
Livestock …
April 11, 2025
International Grain Markets
saying there’s a near-term risk that inflation will rise … In addition, geopolitical risks in the Middle
East are … expected to be 7% lower than the previous year.
12 …
enactment (7/31/15) as well as to previously filed returns that are still … 10 percent on all foreign profits currently deferred.
Eliminates … can put the plan itself at risk.• To solve the problem …
September 30, 2016
Wind Energy Leases
by a grant from the USDA Risk Management Agency through … Agency through the
Southern Risk Management Education Center … electricity?
We know from the previous discussion that
to make …
January 1, 2009
Animal ID & Traceability
The first set of scenarios compare doing nothing (status quo) to adopting
full animal tracing for just the bovine sector. The bovine sector is the
focus here because it is it the sector among bovine, porcine, ovine, and
poultry that would incur the largest adoption cost of NAIS practices.
Under the status quo scenarios, we further explore what the impacts are
if by doing nothing we also lose export market access. We are likely to
lose export market access over time if we do not adopt NAIS practices,
even without any major market or major animal disease event, because
the international marketplace is making animal identification and tracing
systems the norm and any country that does not conform will have less
market access.
Table 2 summarizes the total loss per head to producers in the beef
sector, after all markets adjust as a result of not adopting NAIS practices
(i.e., status quo) under 0%, 10%, 25%, and 50% permanent export
market losses for beef. If we do nothing to adopt NAIS, and nothing
happens to export markets, the result is no cost, no market loss. If we do
nothing and we lose market access, which we believe is likely, the beef
industry will suffer losses. The losses would amount to $18.25 per head if
we do not adopt NAIS and we lose 25% of export market share. To put
this into perspective, this would be about like losing access to the South
Korean export market at 2003 export market shares.
Table 2. Net Annual Loss in Beef Producer Surplus from Status Quo
with Varying Export Market Losses
Export Market Loss Incurred
0% …
August 1, 2018
Breakout Sessions
RISK &PROFIT CONFERENCEMANHATTAN, KANSASAUGUST 17, 2018
Roger … applies– Payments under previous orders are grandfathered … purchase tickets to athletic events at higher education institution• …
November 1, 2009
Pork Quality Grading System and Wholesale Pork Price Reporting
research in
livestock market risk
management, beef demand … handling, food safety,
price risk management and
analysis …