Search
Displaying 11 - 20 of 230
August 23, 2018
yield to more accurately evaluate the trade-off for their farm
26
U.S … yield to more accurately evaluate the trade-off for their farm
29
What … yield to more accurately evaluate the trade-off for their farm
30
U.S …
November 1, 2011
Beef Cattle
behavior. Pastures must be evaluated fre-
quently to assess the … managing number of head per day, evaluating both
short and long term … therefore, supplements should be evalu-
ated on both their energy …
September 22, 2014
Commodity Program Papers
aid will allow farmers to evaluate the
program and to start … 2014, Phone 785-532-1515, e-mail – barnaby@ksu.edu.
2
If … you will be asked for your email address before going to
the …
May 23, 2013
Risk Management Strategies
2013, Phone
785-532-1515, e-mail – barnaby@ksu.edu … cents. Tuesday’s webinar evaluated the
alternative of buying … have other comments, please email me at: abarnaby@agecon.ksu.edu …
March 14, 2013
Risk Management Strategies
2013, Phone
785-532-1515, e-mail – barnaby@ksu.edu … cents. Tuesday’s webinar evaluated the
alternative of buying … have other comments, please email me at: abarnaby@agecon.ksu.edu …
2014
877-KS-SOYBEAN
Fax: 785-271-1302
Email: hupe@kansassoybeans.org … 321-3276 Fax: (785) 532-6532 Email:
fbuhler@k-state.edu … FILL OUT YOUR CON-
FERENCE EVALUATION
(GOLD SHEET).
THANK …
June 25, 2019
Economics, Kansas State Univ.
Email: gtonsor@ksu.edu Twitter … Consumption
http://www.beefboard.org/evaluation/
130612demanddeterminantstudy.asp
2013 … and Ted C. Schroeder
Joint Evaluation Advisory Committee Meeting
January …
2015
321-3276 Fax: (785) 532-6532 Email:
fbuhler@k-state.edu
Master … 877-577-6923)
Fax: 785-271-1302
Email: info@kansassoybeans.org … Irrigation Decisions
We evaluate changes in irrigation decisions …
February 6, 2017
Economics from K-State.
Email: robinreid@ksu.edu Phone … analysis and optimization.
Email: dpendell@ksu.edu Phone … alternative feeds
Critically evaluate “cure-alls”
Utilize a …
September 1, 2015
KFMA Newsletters
Terry Griffin
Status of Precision Agriculture
The commercialization of GPS along with sensor technology in the 1990s gave rise to what we refer to as ‘precision
agriculture’. During the last twenty years, many farmers have adopted the technology and even utilized it in ways that
the industry had not anticipated; however, not all farms use the technology today due to a variety of reasons. One
reason often stated is the uncertainty regarding the return on investment. Today, the agricultural industry has a
renewed interest in precision agriculture due to advances that seemingly improve production and profitability.
Academic studies that evaluate the profitability of precision agriculture technologies have indicated inconsistent results.
Most of these studies focused on a single field rather as a whole‐farm system. Several studies have reported survey‐
based perceptions and adoption of precision agriculture, however only a few reports are still being produced. The
largest and most rigorous survey of farm‐level adoption and use of technology has been the U.S. Department of
Agriculture Economic Research Service unit of the Agricultural Resource Management Survey (USDA ARMS) survey. The
most recent USDA ARMS report was based on 2001 to 2009 data (Schimmelpfennig and Ebel, 2011). They reported that
less than half of all planted acres in 2009 were harvested with a combine equipped with a GPS and yield monitor. The
September …