Search

Displaying 1 - 8 of 8
March 1, 2016 KFMA Newsletters
information on Managing Financial Risk in Today’s Environment … 2 Managing Financial Risk in Today’s Environment1 … you manage the financial risks faced by your business …
March 1, 2013
http://www.agmanager.info/livestock/budgets/production/default.asp#Beef Cattle Economic … http://www.agmanager.info/livestock/marketing/outlook/newsletters/FinishingReturns/default.asp • Excess capacity concerns … 12-18 months - Should be profit opportunities on the horizon …
March 26, 2013
http://www.agmanager.info/livestock/budgets/production/default.asp#Beef Cattle January Cattle … 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 Mil. Head C-N-38 02/04/13 +1.9 … 3/25/13’ http://www.agmanager.info/livestock/marketing/graphs/cattle/prices/default.asp 8 As of: 2/11/13’ http …
July 18, 2012 Energy
cost variability and greater risk management challenges ...........18 Figure … characterized by natural lag between profits and changes in slaughter … crops. In the 2000-01 to 2010-11 corn mar- keting years …
July 18, 2012 Cash Prices & Marketing Strategies
cost variability and greater risk management challenges ...........18 Figure … characterized by natural lag between profits and changes in slaughter … crops. In the 2000-01 to 2010-11 corn mar- keting years …
September 1, 2011 Animal ID & Traceability
systems, the United States risks becoming less competitive … becoming less competitive and risks losing market access. This … http://www.agmanager.info/livestock/marketing/AnimalID/default.asp www.agmanager.info …
January 1, 2009 Animal ID & Traceability
    The first set of scenarios compare doing nothing (status quo) to adopting  full animal tracing for just the bovine sector.  The bovine sector is the  focus here because it is it the sector among bovine, porcine, ovine, and  poultry that would incur the largest adoption cost of NAIS practices.   Under the status quo scenarios, we further explore what the impacts are  if by doing nothing we also lose export market access.  We are likely to  lose export market access over time if we do not adopt NAIS practices,  even without any major market or major animal disease event, because  the international marketplace is making animal identification and tracing  systems the norm and any country that does not conform will have less  market access.    Table 2 summarizes the total loss per head to producers in the beef  sector, after all markets adjust as a result of not adopting NAIS practices  (i.e.,  status quo) under 0%, 10%, 25%, and 50% permanent export  market losses for beef.  If we do nothing to adopt NAIS, and nothing  happens to export markets, the result is no cost, no market loss.  If we do  nothing and we lose market access, which we believe is likely, the beef  industry will suffer losses.  The losses would amount to $18.25 per head if  we do not adopt NAIS and we lose 25% of export market share.  To put  this into perspective, this would be about like losing access to the South  Korean export market at 2003 export market shares.    Table 2. Net Annual Loss in Beef Producer Surplus from Status Quo  with Varying Export Market Losses     Export Market Loss Incurred  0%  …
September 30, 2016 Wind Energy Leases
by a grant from the USDA Risk Management Agency through … Agency through the Southern Risk Management Education Center … Councils. These are non-profit organizations that operate …