Search

Displaying 1 - 7 of 7
September 15, 2021 Fed Cattle Pricing
DISCOVERY, DIVERGENT INCENTIVES, RISK MANAGEMENT, AND FUTURE … well-informed trade; better manage risk; and inform policy and regulatory … Marketing Cost, Flexibility, & Risk Management; 3) Market Information …
November 1, 2009 Pork Quality Grading System and Wholesale Pork Price Reporting
research in livestock market risk management, beef demand … handling, food safety, price risk management and analysis … contracts.  0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 H ea d …
November 1, 2009
research in livestock market risk management, beef demand … handling, food safety, price risk management and analysis … contracts.  0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 H ea d …
September 14, 2016 Mandatory Price Reporting
director of the Center for Risk Management Education and … research in livestock market risk management, meat demand … payment calculation; the USDA Risk Management Agency established …
January 1, 2009 Animal ID & Traceability
    The first set of scenarios compare doing nothing (status quo) to adopting  full animal tracing for just the bovine sector.  The bovine sector is the  focus here because it is it the sector among bovine, porcine, ovine, and  poultry that would incur the largest adoption cost of NAIS practices.   Under the status quo scenarios, we further explore what the impacts are  if by doing nothing we also lose export market access.  We are likely to  lose export market access over time if we do not adopt NAIS practices,  even without any major market or major animal disease event, because  the international marketplace is making animal identification and tracing  systems the norm and any country that does not conform will have less  market access.    Table 2 summarizes the total loss per head to producers in the beef  sector, after all markets adjust as a result of not adopting NAIS practices  (i.e.,  status quo) under 0%, 10%, 25%, and 50% permanent export  market losses for beef.  If we do nothing to adopt NAIS, and nothing  happens to export markets, the result is no cost, no market loss.  If we do  nothing and we lose market access, which we believe is likely, the beef  industry will suffer losses.  The losses would amount to $18.25 per head if  we do not adopt NAIS and we lose 25% of export market share.  To put  this into perspective, this would be about like losing access to the South  Korean export market at 2003 export market shares.    Table 2. Net Annual Loss in Beef Producer Surplus from Status Quo  with Varying Export Market Losses     Export Market Loss Incurred  0%  …
September 1, 2011 Animal ID & Traceability
systems, the United States risks becoming less competitive … becoming less competitive and risks losing market access. This … becoming less competitive and risks losing market access. The …
April 1, 2005 Industry Economics & Trade
of Feed-Ban and Specified Risk Material Policy Options .........................43 5.1 … Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Events … months of age) as specified risk materials (SRM) not allowed …